[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows' "split status"
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: Windows' "split status" |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:25:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> Not a problem; if we do revert the behavior, we can bring back the
> special slot and the old code. I'd rather we try to DTRT now.
I'm not sure what the TRT is here. But if we later decide that a slot
is the wrong thing, we can at any time turn "nest" into a parameter
(maybe together with "dedicated" and "fixed-size"). Our experience with
parameters is still meager and I wouldn't want to destabilize the
current code more than necessary.
> Emacs will not *add* children to
> an internal window past the number specified by `window-max-children'
> (or the window parameter), but if an internal window winds up with
> excess children for any reason, Emacs does not try to prune it or
> rearrange the window tree.
>
> Does that make sense?
For me it's neither trivial to understand nor trivial to implement. So
I'd be very glad if you gave it a stab. You can't break much - earlier
Emacsen always failed to recombine the windows from my example.
But I wonder where and how people would want to use such a variable.
martin
- Windows' "split status", Chong Yidong, 2011/11/11
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/11
- Re: Windows' "split status", Chong Yidong, 2011/11/11
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/12
- Re: Windows' "split status", Chong Yidong, 2011/11/12
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/13
- Re: Windows' "split status", Chong Yidong, 2011/11/13
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/13
- Re: Windows' "split status", Chong Yidong, 2011/11/15
- Re: Windows' "split status",
martin rudalics <=
- Re: Windows' "split status", Chong Yidong, 2011/11/15
- Re: Windows' "split status", Stefan Monnier, 2011/11/15
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/15
- Re: Windows' "split status", Nix, 2011/11/23
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/23
- Re: Windows' "split status", Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/23
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/23
- Re: Windows' "split status", Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/23
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/24
- Re: Windows' "split status", Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/24