[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3
From: |
Jambunathan K |
Subject: |
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3 |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:11:43 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (windows-nt) |
If split window is really about splitting the window and not really
about the buffer it displays then I would much prefer that these
(split-window-side-by-side &optional SIZE)
(split-window-above-each-other &optional SIZE)
be replaced with
(split-window-linewise &optional here)
(split-window-columnwise &optional here)
In cartesian-speak, to draw a line one needs a point and a
gradient/slope.
here => effectively a boolean. If true, the split will pass through the
current cursor or mouse position.
linewise => a gradient of zero
columnwise => a gradient of infinity
The orientations of line or a column is pretty unambiguous, I believe.
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, (continued)
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lluís, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lluís, 2011/10/27
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Jambunathan K, 2011/10/27
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/10/27
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Alan Mackenzie, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3,
Jambunathan K <=
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lennart Borgman, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Jambunathan K, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, John Yates, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/10/28
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Dave Abrahams, 2011/10/28
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/28
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/28
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Tim Cross, 2011/10/28
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Barry Warsaw, 2011/10/26