[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: more than one prefix argument
From: |
Tim Cross |
Subject: |
Re: more than one prefix argument |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:51:59 +1000 |
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Andreas Röhler
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 27.07.2011 13:21, schrieb Andreas Schwab:
>>
>> Andreas Röhler<address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> We need a number or a boolean.
>>
>> You need to distinguish C-u and 4 as well.
>>
>
> C-u would send `t'
>
which means now your possible values are both numeric and non-numeric,
requiring extra tests and increasing code complexity.
> If the command needs a 4 too possibly, write "p\nP" than enabling both
> input
>
How would you distinguish between that and multiple c-u's as in
C-u C-u C-i C-u M-x command
which ones are p and which ones are P?
>>> "p" should send a number, 1 as default.
>>> "P" a boolean, nil as default.
>>
>> "P" is the raw prefix. "p" is what prefix-numeric-value returns from
>> it.
>
> double-wouble
>
> lets have sent at once whats needed.
>
>
The shiraz tonight was very nice - I don't know if its you or me, but
I can't follow! Sorry.
Tim
- RE: more than one prefix argument, (continued)
- RE: more than one prefix argument, Drew Adams, 2011/07/26
- Re: more than one prefix argument, Andreas Röhler, 2011/07/27
- Re: more than one prefix argument, Tim Cross, 2011/07/27
- Re: more than one prefix argument, Andreas Röhler, 2011/07/27
- Re: more than one prefix argument, Tim Cross, 2011/07/27
- Re: more than one prefix argument, Andreas Röhler, 2011/07/27
- Re: more than one prefix argument, Andreas Schwab, 2011/07/27
- Re: more than one prefix argument, Andreas Röhler, 2011/07/27
- Re: more than one prefix argument, Andreas Schwab, 2011/07/27
- Re: more than one prefix argument,
Tim Cross <=
- Re: more than one prefix argument, Tim Cross, 2011/07/27
- RE: more than one prefix argument, Drew Adams, 2011/07/27
- Re: more than one prefix argument, Tim Cross, 2011/07/27