|
From: | Eric Schulte |
Subject: | Re: elpa.gnu.org repository sync with Emacs |
Date: | Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:29:12 -0700 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes: > > But since the FSF-copyright assignment regime would still apply to > ELPA, we'd wouldn't be able to accept big packages like auctex anyway? > If this is true and ELPA has the same strict copyright restrictions as the Emacs core, then IMO we're losing a significant portion of the benefit of ELPA. There are many packages which will never secure sufficient copyright permissions to be included into Emacs. Such packages were previously available through ELPA. Where can these packages live now? Would it make sense to setup a second ELPA repository for non-FSF software? Forgive me if this issue has already been settled in a previous conversation which I've missed. -- Eric
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |