[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rainbow-mode
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: rainbow-mode |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:25:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
> IIRC, the most recent discussion concluded that none of the half-
> implemented modes is good enough, especially given the nice features
> in the other half-implemented modes, and nobody stepped up to the
> plate to merge them, document the result, and make sure the result
> conforms to coding standards etc.
Again, I think that illustrates my point.
I think experience shows that packages that are in Emacs do get hacked
on to add features that people feel are missing. Small packages that
live outside of Emacs don't get that treatment, as a norm.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
address@hidden * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
- ELPA policy, Julien Danjou, 2010/11/15
- Re: ELPA policy, Chong Yidong, 2010/11/15
- Re: ELPA policy, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/11/15
- Re: ELPA policy, Chong Yidong, 2010/11/15
- rainbow-mode (was: ELPA policy), Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/11/15
- RE: rainbow-mode (was: ELPA policy), Drew Adams, 2010/11/15
- Re: rainbow-mode, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/11/15
- Re: rainbow-mode, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/16
- Re: rainbow-mode,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: rainbow-mode, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/11/16
- Re: rainbow-mode, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/11/16
- Re: rainbow-mode, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/11/16
- Re: rainbow-mode, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/11/16
- Re: rainbow-mode, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/11/16
- Re: rainbow-mode, Julien Danjou, 2010/11/16
- RE: rainbow-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/11/16
- RE: rainbow-mode, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/16
- Re: rainbow-mode, Chong Yidong, 2010/11/15
- Re: rainbow-mode, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/11/15