[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: delete-selection-mode
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: delete-selection-mode |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:40:01 -0700 |
> Given d-s-mode _as it is_, do people think it should be
> enabled by default? That's the question.
>
> If the consensus is strong enough that in its current
> form it should not become the default,
^^^
> That criterion is absolutely wrong.
> This is an incompatible change, so it should not be made unless it
> is clearly right.
>
> The change should not be made if there is substantial opposition based
> on real experience.
How does anything you wrote contradict what I wrote?
I certainly do not disagree with what you wrote, in any case.
If you want to add "based on real experience" after "If the consensus is strong
enough", I certainly support that.
And note the "not" in what I wrote. I certainly was not proposing that we make
an incompatible change based on no real experience.
- Re: delete-selection-mode, (continued)
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/18
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/19
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Juri Linkov, 2010/03/19
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/19
- RE: delete-selection-mode,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/20
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Jason Rumney, 2010/03/18
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/18
- Re: delete-selection-mode, David Kastrup, 2010/03/19
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/19
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Jason Rumney, 2010/03/19
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Miles Bader, 2010/03/20
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/20