[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unit test framework
From: |
rubikitch |
Subject: |
Re: unit test framework |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:16:53 +0900 (JST) |
From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: unit test framework
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:56:51 +0100
Hi,
> I asked long ago for a comparision on EmacsWiki:
>
> http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/UnitTesting
>
> However there have not been any interest in that. If have cc:ed the
> unit test framework authors, maybe they want to say something.
>
> I am not sure which of them have signed papers:
>
> ert: Christian Ohler
> elunit: Phil Hagelberg
> elk-test: Nikolaj Schumacher
> etest: Phil Jackson
> el-mock: rubikitch
I am the author of el-expectations and el-mock.
el-expectations is focused on simpleness and readability.
No assert-* functions, no setup and teardown functions.
It is the same philosophy as expectations in Ruby.
http://expectations.rubyforge.org/files/README.html
el-mock is a mock framework.
Cheers,
--
rubikitch
- unit test framework, Masatake YAMATO, 2010/03/18
- Re: unit test framework, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/18
- Re: unit test framework, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/18
- Re: unit test framework, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/18
- Re: unit test framework,
rubikitch <=
- Re: unit test framework, Phil Hagelberg, 2010/03/19
- Re: unit test framework, Nikolaj Schumacher, 2010/03/20
- Re: unit test framework, joakim, 2010/03/23
- Re: unit test framework, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/23
- Re: unit test framework, Masatake YAMATO, 2010/03/23
- Re: unit test framework, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/23
- Re: unit test framework, Philip Jackson, 2010/03/23