[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Commit netiquette.
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Commit netiquette. |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:09:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) |
Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 20:25, Alfred M. Szmidt <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> If you feel I missed your main point, then you should repeat it, since
>> I cannot answer what I do not know.
>
> OK.
>
> "Most people seem to agree that the one-line summary is a nice thing to
> have in some contexts. Are you going to go against policy?"
Policy is not the same as agreement.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Commit netiquette., (continued)
- Re: Commit netiquette., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/02/20
- Re: Commit netiquette., Miles Bader, 2010/02/20
- Re: Commit netiquette., Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/20
- Re: Commit netiquette., Miles Bader, 2010/02/21
- Re: Commit netiquette., Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/21
- Re: Commit netiquette., Stefan Monnier, 2010/02/23
- Re: Commit netiquette., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/02/23
- Re: Commit netiquette., Juanma Barranquero, 2010/02/20
- Re: Commit netiquette., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/02/23
- Re: Commit netiquette., Juanma Barranquero, 2010/02/23
- Re: Commit netiquette.,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Commit netiquette., Juanma Barranquero, 2010/02/23
Re: Commit netiquette., Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/18
Re: Commit netiquette., Miles Bader, 2010/02/19
Re: Commit netiquette., Mark A. Hershberger, 2010/02/18