[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VC: log of sub-directory?
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: VC: log of sub-directory? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:33:10 -0800 (PST) |
Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> writes:
> Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > > VC-dir only shows modified files, so if the user wants to see the log
of
> >
> > > an unedited file he must to visit it and then C-x v l
> > >
> > > But AFAIK, there is no way of seeing the log of a versioned
> > > sub-directory. I'm not sure how that could be implemented (maybe C-x d
> > > <directory> [INTRO] C-x v l)
> >
> > ???
> > C-x v d THE_SUBDIRECTORY_YOU_WANT RET
> > C-x v l
> > works just fine...
>
> So the point must be on the upper part of the buffer. Thanks.
Technically it should on the "./" entry, but the header is considered
equivalent to "./".
> What about getting the combined log of two or more files/directories?
If the files/directories are shown in the same vc-dir buffer, select
them and do C-x v l
- VC: log of sub-directory?, Óscar Fuentes, 2009/12/28
- Re: VC: log of sub-directory?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/12/29
- Re: VC: log of sub-directory?, Óscar Fuentes, 2009/12/29
- Re: VC: log of sub-directory?,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: VC: log of sub-directory?, Óscar Fuentes, 2009/12/29
- Re: VC: log of sub-directory?, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/29
- Re: VC: log of sub-directory?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/12/29
- Re: VC: log of sub-directory?, Óscar Fuentes, 2009/12/29
- Re: VC: log of sub-directory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/30