[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VC: log of sub-directory?
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: VC: log of sub-directory? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:23:16 -0800 (PST) |
Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> writes:
> Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > > What about getting the combined log of two or more files/directories?
> >
> > If the files/directories are shown in the same vc-dir buffer, select
> > them and do C-x v l
> Yes, that was clear. But if the files/directories are not shown on the
> vc-dir buffer (because them are not edited) ?
You can do the same thing from dired, select and C-x v l
> OTOH I realize that that behaviour (showing only edited files) is that
> the roots of vc-dir and most likely can not be changed easily.
vc-dir does not care, it can show up to date files too (and it does: for
example after a check-in). If the VC backend sends a list of all files,
vc-dir can display them just fine.
- VC: log of sub-directory?, Óscar Fuentes, 2009/12/28
- Re: VC: log of sub-directory?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/12/29
- Re: VC: log of sub-directory?, Óscar Fuentes, 2009/12/29
- Re: VC: log of sub-directory?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/12/29
- Re: VC: log of sub-directory?, Óscar Fuentes, 2009/12/29
- Re: VC: log of sub-directory?, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/29
- Re: VC: log of sub-directory?,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: VC: log of sub-directory?, Óscar Fuentes, 2009/12/29
- Re: VC: log of sub-directory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/30