[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mail mode vs message mode
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: Mail mode vs message mode |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:53:04 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
> If the message-mode defaults aren't changed by deriving from mail-*, I
> don't object.
>
> I'd certainly object to any change that makes message-mode less
> "standard" compliant ("standards" like RFCs, GNKSA [1], good common
> practice, ...).
I've switched several message-mode defcustoms to the mail-* values.
I've also made some changes to the mail-* defaults, so I don't think
message mode users should see any change (mail mode users won't see much
difference, either).
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, (continued)
Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Miles Bader, 2009/11/15
Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Chong Yidong, 2009/11/17
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Reiner Steib, 2009/11/17
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Chong Yidong, 2009/11/18
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Reiner Steib, 2009/11/18
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Teemu Likonen, 2009/11/19
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode,
Chong Yidong <=
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2009/11/19
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Reiner Steib, 2009/11/22
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2009/11/24
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Reiner Steib, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Chong Yidong, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Miles Bader, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/28
Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2009/11/27