[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mail mode vs message mode
From: |
Teemu Likonen |
Subject: |
Re: Mail mode vs message mode |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:56:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
On 2009-11-18 20:20 (+0100), Reiner Steib wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18 2009, Chong Yidong wrote:
>> We can do it your way if you really object to making the message-mode
>> options default to the corresponding mail-* options, but I'd like to
>> know the reasoning first. (If any of the default values for the
>> mail-* options grate, like mail-from-style, we can change them.)
>
> If the message-mode defaults aren't changed by deriving from mail-*, I
> don't object.
>
> I'd certainly object to any change that makes message-mode less
> "standard" compliant ("standards" like RFCs, GNKSA [1], good common
> practice, ...). Changing the default `message-yank-prefix' to nil
> violates GNKSA, item 10 b and c:
Yes, please use "> " as *-yank-prefix. It's the only sane choice, the
only one which is compatible with the world.
Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Chong Yidong, 2009/11/17
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Reiner Steib, 2009/11/17
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Chong Yidong, 2009/11/18
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Reiner Steib, 2009/11/18
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode,
Teemu Likonen <=
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Chong Yidong, 2009/11/19
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2009/11/19
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Reiner Steib, 2009/11/22
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2009/11/24
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Reiner Steib, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Chong Yidong, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Miles Bader, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/28