[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Grand Unified Debugger Rewrite's process buffer: comint, eterm or
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Grand Unified Debugger Rewrite's process buffer: comint, eterm or |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:19:16 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I have started to rewrite gud from the ground up.
That's interesting. I hope you will start with the assumption that
there are several active GUD sessions (each using potentially different
debuggers for different languages). It's a kind of change that's
difficult to make after the fact, but that's fairly easy to build-in
from the beginning.
> 1. I can stick with comint.el. It seems the most creaky.
> 2. term.el is pretty cool, but it doesn't provide a hook to run when
> output is produced and this is something I need. I use it both in
> comint.el and eshell.el in "shell tracker" (think pdb-track) mode. So
> this leads to the last choice ...
In order to make a choice, I think we need to know what problems we're
trying to address.
Stefan