Re: update-subdirs and lisp/term

[Stefan Monnier]

>> > Does anyone know why we skip lisp/term in update-subdirs?
>> Because files in lisp/term are always loaded with the term/ prefix.
> Thanks.  But why is that a good idea?

It reduces the length of load-path and increases our namespace?

> A remnant from past, perhaps,
> when lisp/term held only terminal-specific files?

Let me put it another way: why would it be a good idea to put lisp/term
in update-subdirs?


        Stefan