[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: point-min and 1
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: point-min and 1 |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:30:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
martin rudalics <address@hidden> writes:
>>> I'd opt for two new primitives `goto-point-min' and `goto-point-max'.
>>
>> And `goto-line-noninteractively' ;)
>
> Hmmm.... Every second use of `point-min' is within the idiom (goto-char
> (point-min)). So I think I have a point here.
That's exactly why you don't have a point. Every second use of "think"
is within the idiom "I think", and yet we don't use a separate word for
it. Because we don't need a separate word for a common simple idiom
comprised of elementary parts.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: point-min and 1, (continued)
- Re: point-min and 1, martin rudalics, 2009/08/12
- Re: point-min and 1, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/12
- Re: point-min and 1, Miles Bader, 2009/08/12
- Re: point-min and 1, Daniel Colascione, 2009/08/12
- Re: point-min and 1, martin rudalics, 2009/08/13
- Re: point-min and 1, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/13
- Re: point-min and 1, martin rudalics, 2009/08/13
- Re: point-min and 1, Chong Yidong, 2009/08/13
- Re: point-min and 1, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/13
- Re: point-min and 1, martin rudalics, 2009/08/14
- Re: point-min and 1,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: point-min and 1, martin rudalics, 2009/08/14
- Re: point-min and 1, Miles Bader, 2009/08/14
- Re: point-min and 1, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/13
- Re: point-min and 1, martin rudalics, 2009/08/14
- Re: point-min and 1, David Kastrup, 2009/08/14
- Re: point-min and 1, martin rudalics, 2009/08/14
Re: point-min and 1, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/11