[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rmail-mbox branch
From: |
Evil Boris |
Subject: |
Re: Rmail-mbox branch |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:38:52 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (windows-nt) |
Evil Boris <address@hidden> writes:
> But there is a more general problem with this: I do not like losing
> data or making irreversible changes. If the said msg contained another
> alternative (say, HTML) that I later would discover contained some
> information I needed, I am not sure how easy it would be to get it
> back. Maybe I am just being paranoid.
Forgot an important point (of course): After such a manipulation
[undoing quoted-printable- or base64-encoded msg and hand-decoding it],
is it clear that the file is a legitimate mbox file, usable by other
applications? Or is this not one of the design goals of Rmail-mbox?
--Boris
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/01
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Evil Boris, 2008/09/01
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/09/01
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Evil Boris, 2008/09/01
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch,
Evil Boris <=
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/09/01
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Evil Boris, 2008/09/02
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Paul Michael Reilly, 2008/09/03
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/02
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/09/02
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/03
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/09/03
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/03
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/09/03
- Re: Rmail-mbox branch, Paul Michael Reilly, 2008/09/04