[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:03:57 +0300 |
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> Cc: Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:54:55 +0900
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > I meant would it break something if "\\cj" matched only the Katakana
> > and Hiragana characters instead of what it matches today?
>
> I don't know what it would break, but that doesn't seem like
> particularly intuitive behavior.
??? Why not?
> I think emacs' concept of characters belonging to multiple language
> categories is pretty neat actually.
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how the fact that, say,
Cyrillic characters are claimed to belong to Japanese category could
be considered ``neat''.
- Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO, (continued)
- Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/05
- Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO, Kenichi Handa, 2008/08/06
- Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/06
- Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO, Kenichi Handa, 2008/08/06
- Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/06
- Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/06
- Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO, Kenichi Handa, 2008/08/06
- Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/06
- Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO, Kenichi Handa, 2008/08/06
- Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO, Miles Bader, 2008/08/07
- Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/07
- Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO, Miles Bader, 2008/08/11
- Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/11