[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation* |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:09:22 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> > I would guess that a default of t for
>> > compilation-scroll-output would be better that the current
>> > default of nil, but YMMV. When I'm compiling, I generally
>> > want to see progress, so I generally want Emacs to scroll the
>> > window for me.
>>
>> Agreed,
>>
>> I disagree. I find that I can't read the output of compilation if it
>> scrolls. Compilers are too fast these days! Now, if we could slow them
>> down, maybe it would be ok to scroll the output. Any ideas?
> Two different use cases here. For Richard, the actual output is
> important; for example, maybe he wants to see compilation warnings.
> For the others, only motion (scrolling) is important as an indicator
> of progress, and they want to see the error (if any) or successful
> completion immediately when it happens.
If you use compilation-auto-jump-first-error, then whether it jumps to
the first error or the first warning depends on your
compilation-skip-threshold.
Stefan
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, (continued)
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/07
- RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/08
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/08
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/07