[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation* |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:15:42 -0500 |
Well, you wrote that the screen scrolling was too fast. You specified
a workaround of slowing down the compiler, but that seems silly since
Emacs will buffer as much text as the compiler wants to throw at it.
So I propose slowing down the scrolling to a pace at which you can
keep up with it, which of course will vary depending on how heavily
multitasked you are.
It sounds like this means it would scroll more slowly, but steadily,
unless/until it catches up with the end of the output.
It sounds worth a try.
I have no problem editing in one window while window-point is moving
in another.
I too can do that, if I block out whatever happens in the other
window.
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, (continued)
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Juri Linkov, 2008/02/07
- RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/08
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/08
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*,
Richard Stallman <=