[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging multitty
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Merging multitty |
Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2007 17:56:16 -0400 |
It might be better to merge into the arch version of the trunk, and then
let that be committed to CVS. The multi-tty is already in arch, so
merging back into the arch-trunk should be basically trivial, and using
the regular arch->CVS gateway is probably safer than doing a one-off.
What does arch->CVS give in the way of CVS log entries?
I hope it does not put the entire change log into each file's CVS log!
- Re: Merging multitty, (continued)
- merging Unicode branch and availability of Windows binaries, Drew Adams, 2007/05/11
- RE: merging Unicode branch and availability of Windows binaries, Drew Adams, 2007/05/14
- Re: merging Unicode branch and availability of Windows binaries, David Kastrup, 2007/05/14
- RE: merging Unicode branch and availability of Windows binaries, Drew Adams, 2007/05/14
- Re: merging Unicode branch and availability of Windows binaries, David Kastrup, 2007/05/14
- Re: Merging multitty, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/11
- Re: Merging multitty, Miles Bader, 2007/05/11
- Re: Merging multitty, David Kastrup, 2007/05/11
- Re: Merging multitty,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Merging multitty, Miles Bader, 2007/05/12
- Re: Merging multitty, Nick Roberts, 2007/05/12
- Re: Merging multitty, Miles Bader, 2007/05/12
- Re: Merging multitty, Nick Roberts, 2007/05/13
- Re: Merging multitty, Miles Bader, 2007/05/13
- Re: Merging multitty, Karoly Lorentey, 2007/05/13
- Re: Merging multitty, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/14
- Re: Merging multitty, Miles Bader, 2007/05/14
- Re: Merging multitty, Karoly Lorentey, 2007/05/14
- Re: Merging multitty, Kim F. Storm, 2007/05/14