[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How to stop find-grep-dired?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: How to stop find-grep-dired? |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Sep 2006 11:10:56 +0900 |
Juri Linkov <address@hidden> writes:
> Do you know why comint doesn't bind C-c C-k to comint-kill-subjob?
> Are there any reasons not to do so?
It's almost always the wrong thing to use, especially for a typical
comint process [*], so having a handy binding by default seems like
asking for trouble.
[*] (1) It send SIGKILL, which is a last-ditch emergency measure, not
the way you should ordinarily stop a process
(2) Because it sends a _signal_, rather than using pty, it will kill
the sub-shell rather than the foreground process, in the case of
a shell session (not to mention a telnet session etc).
-Miles
--
.Numeric stability is probably not all that important when you're guessing.
- Re: How to stop find-grep-dired?, (continued)
- Re: How to stop find-grep-dired?, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/23
- Re: How to stop find-grep-dired?, Juri Linkov, 2006/08/29
- Re: How to stop find-grep-dired?, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/30
- Re: How to stop find-grep-dired?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/30
- Re: How to stop find-grep-dired?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/31
- Re: How to stop find-grep-dired?, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/31
- Re: How to stop find-grep-dired?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/31
- Re: How to stop find-grep-dired?, Juri Linkov, 2006/08/31
- Re: How to stop find-grep-dired?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: How to stop find-grep-dired?, Juri Linkov, 2006/08/30
- Re: How to stop find-grep-dired?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/08/21
- Re: How to stop find-grep-dired?, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/21
Re: How to stop find-grep-dired?, Andreas Schwab, 2006/08/19