[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: valid_pointer_p
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: valid_pointer_p |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Aug 2006 00:56:02 +0300 |
> Cc: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> From: address@hidden (Kim F. Storm)
> Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 22:19:50 +0200
>
> > Am I missing something?
>
> No. My simple approach was simply to assume that if you can access the
> size field of a vector, you can access the rest as well. I don't mind
> making a more correct implementation, although I didn't see the need --
> after all, this is for a corner case of debugging emacs.
It could be annoying to get INVALID for a perfectly valid object, and
fixing the current code seems easy enough. But I don't have time to
do this myself, so it's your call.
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/05
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/05
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/05
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/05
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/11
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/12
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Andreas Schwab, 2006/08/12
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/12
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/12
- Re: valid_pointer_p,
Eli Zaretskii <=