[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: valid_pointer_p
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: valid_pointer_p |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Aug 2006 16:09:38 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 16:04:22 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> Btw, you always try to validate a 16-byte region starting at the
> address P, which might give a false positive
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Err... make that ``false negative'', meaning that a pointer is
declared invalid while it actually is valid.
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/05
- Re: valid_pointer_p,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/05
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/05
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/11
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/12
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Andreas Schwab, 2006/08/12
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/12
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/12
- Re: valid_pointer_p, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/08/12