Re: PURESIZE increased (again)

[David Kastrup]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> Cc: address@hidden
>> From: Ken Raeburn <address@hidden>
>> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:24:55 -0400
>> 
>> The byte and object counts *should* be the same (uh, unless the  
>> pathnames to the elc files are stored somewhere but el file pathnames  
>> are not).
>
> Even if this is true (which I don't think it is), how can a stored
> name explain 20KB of difference?

Maybe the principal data structure for a byte code passage takes a
different size because of alignment or data type issues?

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum