[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
From: |
Reiner Steib |
Subject: |
Re: PURESIZE increased (again) |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:03:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110005 (No Gnus v0.5) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu, Apr 20 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Reiner Steib <address@hidden>
[...]
>> ,----
>> | Dumping under names emacs and emacs-22.0.50.1
>> | emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 2155304 bytes needed)
>> | 5504 pure bytes used
>
> This has nothing to do with PURESIZE, it's the ridiculously low number
> 5504 that is the problem. (Note that, on a 64-bit host, 2155304 is
> well within the limits of BASE_PURESIZE enlarged by PURESIZE_RATIO.)
>
> How come you only have 5504 bytes of space in the pure[] array? Is
> this during the first stage of bootstrap perhaps?
It was in "make bootstrap".
> If so, please look at the last "Dumping under names ..." message
> near the end of the build, it's that one that's important.
Now I've built again (without a bootstrap) and I got (there is only
one "Dumping under names" in the logs):
,----[ 64 bit ]
| Loading tooltip...
| nil
| Finding pointers to doc strings...
| Finding pointers to doc strings...done
| Dumping under names emacs and emacs-22.0.50.3
| emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 2155304 bytes needed)
| 5504 pure bytes used
| ./emacs -q -batch -f list-load-path-shadows
`----
I also get the "Pure space overflow" warning from
`fancy-splash-screens-1':
,----[ <f1> v pure-space-overflow RET ]
| pure-space-overflow is a variable defined in `startup.el'.
| Its value is t
`----
,----[ <f1> v pure-bytes-used RET ]
| pure-bytes-used is a variable defined in `src/alloc.c'.
| Its value is 5504
|
| Documentation:
| Number of bytes of sharable Lisp data allocated so far.
`----
On a 32 bit host (same source tree) I get:
,----[ 32 bit ]
| Dumping under names emacs and emacs-22.0.50.2
| emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 1343128 bytes needed)
| 3616 pure bytes used
`----
> (I imagine you already know that.)
No, I didn't know. And I don't know why these numbers are so low on
my machines. How can I investigate? Will it cause problems?
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
- PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/16
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/16
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Romain Francoise, 2006/04/16
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Andreas Schwab, 2006/04/16
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/16
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Reiner Steib, 2006/04/20
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/20
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again),
Reiner Steib <=
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/20
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/21
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/21
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/21
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Reiner Steib, 2006/04/26
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), David Kastrup, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28