[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gud.el bug + patch
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: gud.el bug + patch |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Mar 2006 12:15:49 +1200 |
> >> I found that having 'run' in .gdbinit triggers the problem;
> >> this recipe should do it:
>
> Nick> The mode works for you otherwise?
>
> Yes, it works very well otherwise. I believe Emacs from 2006-01
> worked even with the 'run' command in .gdbinit.
I've reverted a change from 2006-03-10 which means that "M-x gdba" should
work for this case now.
But are you saying that "M-x gdb" worked from 2006-01?
If you are I'll investigate further, but if not I'd rather not hack it any
further to try to get it to work. I would prefer to move the "--fullname"
operation out to another command after the release, assuming the new mode is
well received.
> I guess it's more complicated than I thought; I got excited before
> thinking I had solved the problem. Maybe you could use 'gdb -n'
> to inhibit .gdbinit and then load .gdbinit after the necessary
> Emacs gud-mode initialization.
That might be a bit too hairy, the user might specify no init file (-nx),
an init file by a different name (-x)...
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- gud.el bug + patch, Karl Chen, 2006/03/24
- Re: gud.el bug + patch, Nick Roberts, 2006/03/24
- Re: gud.el bug + patch, Karl Chen, 2006/03/24
- Re: gud.el bug + patch, Nick Roberts, 2006/03/24
- Re: gud.el bug + patch, Karl Chen, 2006/03/24
- Re: gud.el bug + patch,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: gud.el bug + patch, Karl Chen, 2006/03/27
- Re: gud.el bug + patch, Nick Roberts, 2006/03/27
- Re: gud.el bug + patch, Karl Chen, 2006/03/27