[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: thumbs.el and transparency
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: thumbs.el and transparency |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:45:09 -0500 |
I based my reasoning on an opinion expressed on this thread that both
packages should exist in Emacs. But actually I have no opinion about this.
Given the choice between a simple thumbnail package and more advanced one,
I personally would definitely select the latter.
I think it should be possible to make tumme do everything that thumbs
can do, and just as conveniently.
I think instead of adding all features of thumbs.el to tumme.el it is more
urgent to make tumme.el more usable, so it would have more than one user ;-)
I agree, that is the first thing to be done. But hasn't a lot of it
been done in the past week?
- Re: tumme testing, (continued)
- Re: tumme testing, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/12
- Re: tumme testing, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/12
- Re: tumme testing, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/12
- Re: tumme testing, Robert J. Chassell, 2006/02/12
- Re: tumme testing, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/13
- RE: tumme testing, Drew Adams, 2006/02/13
- Re: tumme testing, Tomas Zerolo, 2006/02/14
- Re: tumme testing, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/14
- Re: tumme testing, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/13
- Re: tumme testing, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/11
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency, Miles Bader, 2006/02/09
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/10
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/10
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/10
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/10
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/11
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/12
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/12
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/11
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency, Mattis, 2006/02/12