Re: latexenc and `TeX-master'

[David Reitter]

On 22 Jan 2006, at 17:21, Arne Jørgensen wrote:

> Arne Jørgensen <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > But it is probably better to check if the file is a regular and then
> > also check if it is actually readable.
>
> Readability is already checked later in the code. Checking whether the
> file is a regular file is also better checked at that point.

yes, I agree. The second change (below) should catch all other cases.


*** latexenc.el 02 Dec 2005 13:24:11 +0000      1.11
--- latexenc.el 22 Jan 2006 08:52:12 +0000      
***************
*** 174,180 ****
                          (find-file-noselect latexenc-main-file t)))
                    (coding-system-base   ;Disregard the EOL part of  
the CS.
                     (with-current-buffer latexenc-main-buffer
!                      (or coding-system-for-write buffer-file-coding- 
system))))
                'undecided))))
      'undecided))

--- 175,183 ----
                          (find-file-noselect latexenc-main-file t)))
                    (coding-system-base   ;Disregard the EOL part of  
the CS.
                     (with-current-buffer latexenc-main-buffer
!                      (or coding-system-for-write
!                        buffer-file-coding-system
!                        'undecided))))
                'undecided))))
      'undecided))