[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bugwithbyte-compilation]
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bugwithbyte-compilation] |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:40:10 -0800 |
See my previous message - I already indicated that the
menu-enable is testing a void variable. The question is
why it is void.
It is void because there is nothing in the code to set it.
Why do you think it would NOT be void?
There are a couple of questions involved (see my email),
including how define-minor-mode works.
What does this have to do with define-minor-mode?
Your code does not use define-minor-mode.
Please see my previous emails, where I describe the original case (which
uses define-minor-mode). That may or may not be related to the crash, but it
is a question I have and perhaps a potential problem. There are additional
questions raised and problems mentioned in my previous emails on this.
- address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bug with byte-compilation], Richard Stallman, 2005/12/04
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bug with byte-compilation], Chong Yidong, 2005/12/07
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bug with byte-compilation], Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/07
- RE: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bug with byte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/08
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bug with byte-compilation], Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/09
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bug with byte-compilation], Chong Yidong, 2005/12/09
- RE: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bug withbyte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/09
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bug with byte-compilation], Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/09
- RE: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bug withbyte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/11
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bug withbyte-compilation], Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/12
- RE: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bugwithbyte-compilation],
Drew Adams <=
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bugwithbyte-compilation], Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/12
- RE: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/12
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/13
- RE: address@hidden: RE: weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/13
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Johan Bockgård, 2005/12/13
- RE: address@hidden: RE:weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/13
- RE: address@hidden:RE:weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/13
- Re: address@hidden: RE:weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Johan Bockgård, 2005/12/14
- RE: address@hidden:RE:weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/14
- Re: address@hidden:RE:weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Johan Bockgård, 2005/12/14