[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: weird behavior of ediff with multiple displays]
From: |
Lőrentey Károly |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: weird behavior of ediff with multiple displays] |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Dec 2005 21:34:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.52 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I don't think this is the right thing to do in all cases.
> This shouldn't happen when there is another frame that already has a
> minibuffer.
>
> I don't like the idea of making one frame use another frame's
> minibuffer, as a default. If you want to do that, you can do it
> explicitly, by specifying a different value for the `minibuffer' frame
> parameter. But the thing Emacs does automatically is create a separate
> minibuffer frame.
>
> I just commented out an incorrect change which would have altered
> that.
When Emacs starts up under X, it automatically initializes
default-minibuffer-frame to be the initial frame. The change I made
emulates this behaviour for display devices other than the initial
one. Without this change, Emacs behaves inconsistently. If the
automatic setting of default-minibuffer-frame is wrong, then I suggest
to remove its assignment from `frame-initialize' as well.
--
Károly
pgphroRycqG9p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: address@hidden: weird behavior of ediff with multiple displays], Lőrentey Károly, 2005/12/08