[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: display word wrapping
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: display word wrapping |
Date: |
Mon, 31 May 2004 20:39:17 +0200 |
On Mon, 31 May 2004 19:55:53 +0200, "Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> wrote:
> It isn't allowed to assume that. AFAIK, unlike the `register'
> qualifier, `volatile' is not an advisory one, it's mandatory.
Yes. But unless I've made some kind of mistake (I'll recheck), the code
generated does not vary.
> But as Andreas points out, the declaration itself is incorrect. If
> so, changing it to whatever is right should make a difference. Here,
> try this:
>
> struct image * volatile img;
>
> Did that work?
That's what I really tried, and no, it doesn't make any difference.
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: display word wrapping, (continued)
- Re: display word wrapping, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/29
- Re: display word wrapping, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/30
- Re: display word wrapping, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/30
- Re: display word wrapping, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/30
- Re: display word wrapping, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/30
- Re: display word wrapping, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/31
- Re: display word wrapping, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/31
- Re: display word wrapping, Andreas Schwab, 2004/05/31
- Re: display word wrapping, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/31
- Re: display word wrapping, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/31
- Re: display word wrapping,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: display word wrapping, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/31
- Re: display word wrapping, Andreas Schwab, 2004/05/31
- Re: display word wrapping, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/31
- Re: display word wrapping, Miles Bader, 2004/05/31
- Re: display word wrapping, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/31
- Re: display word wrapping, Jason Rumney, 2004/05/31
- Re: display word wrapping, Andreas Schwab, 2004/05/31
- Re: display word wrapping, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/31
- Re: display word wrapping, Jason Rumney, 2004/05/31
- Re: display word wrapping, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/31