[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search
From: |
Karl Eichwalder |
Subject: |
Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search |
Date: |
Wed, 19 May 2004 07:22:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Kai Grossjohann <address@hidden> writes:
> I have similar feelings. However, I have decided that I would like
> to try it for a while longer before reaching a decision. Perhaps I
> can retrain myself to always exit with RET.
Agreed. The current implementation looks clean and I'm sure I can get
used to it the next weeks.
"Robert J. Chassell" <address@hidden> writes:
> Same here. Please change them, perhaps to M-C-b and M-C-f.
Being force to press three key to move one step forward or backward is
too expensive. As long as you can press M-f or M-b to break out of the
search the implementation is okay - To break out I mostly use: RET,
C-SPC, M-f or M-b, or - yes - arrow-left or arrow-right.
> The feature itself is exellent. But I still have trouble with the
> keybindings. I never knew I used `C-b' & `C-f' so often, but I do,
> and the habit is very hard to break.
yes, but I think it is more important that having found the first
occurance of the (beginning of) string you can press several C-f in a
row to extent the search string; that less error prone than being force
to enter all the different letters: k-i-n-d-e-r-g-a-r-t-e-n. Yes, I
know, you can complete the search word using C-w; but often, you are not
interested in the complete word and thus you cannot make use of C-w.
--
| ,__o
| _-\_<,
http://www.gnu.franken.de/ke/ | (*)/'(*)
- @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Miles Bader, 2004/05/18
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/18
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Karl Fogel, 2004/05/18
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/05/18
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, David Kastrup, 2004/05/18
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search,
Karl Eichwalder <=
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/20
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, David Kastrup, 2004/05/20
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Kenichi Handa, 2004/05/20
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, David Kastrup, 2004/05/20
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Kenichi Handa, 2004/05/20
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Kevin Rodgers, 2004/05/20
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, David Kastrup, 2004/05/20
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Peter Lee, 2004/05/20
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/24
Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Robert J. Chassell, 2004/05/18