[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Several suggestions for image support
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Several suggestions for image support |
Date: |
29 Apr 2004 00:52:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > The line distance is determined differently: it is constant for a
> > frame unless that would cause overlapping rows with the actual glyph
> > dimensions, or unless we change it with special properties on the
> > newline characters. Those special properties can also be put on space
> > and other characters but have no effect there.
> >
> > At least that's how I understood the last proposals. It means that if
> > one wants to have a paragraph with smaller line distance, one can
> > explicitly cover it with an appropriate property.
>
> With my latest changes, emacs has two properties on newlines:
>
> * line-height which gives the minimum line height;
> default minimum line height is given by the height of the face
> of the newline character.
>
> The actual line height is determined by the text on the line;
> if some glyphs are taller than the minimum line height, the
> actual line height is increased.
That's what I meant with "unless that would cause overlapping rows".
> * line-spacing which adds additional pixels between this line and the
> next line. Default is the value of the line-spacing variable
> (usually 0).
>
> So there is still no "fixed line-distance" concept in emacs, as
> lines can always be taller than the ordinary line-distance.
>
> BTW, the line-height and line-spacing properties are currently only
> supported as text-properties; should this be extended to check for
> overlays too?
Yes. I'll need this eventually in preview-latex for sliced images,
and preview-latex works exclusively with overlays (it never touches
the text itself).
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, (continued)
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/26
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/26
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/26
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Miles Bader, 2004/04/26
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/27
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/27
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/27
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/29
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/29
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/29
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/25
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/28
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/29
- Re: Several suggestions for image support, David Kastrup, 2004/04/29