[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent)
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent) |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:31:13 -0500 |
> The main exception, as far as I can see, is font-lock specifications, which
> generally look like indecipherable gobs of hair, so the face names tend to
> stand out as the one thing who's meaning is obvious.
Most font-lock specifications don't use face names but variable names.
So it's actually not an exception,
Stefan
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), (continued)
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Richard Stallman, 2002/10/28
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Henrik Enberg, 2002/10/28
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/28
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Miles Bader, 2002/10/28
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Richard Stallman, 2002/10/29
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Miles Bader, 2002/10/28
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/28
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Miles Bader, 2002/10/28
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/28
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Henrik Enberg, 2002/10/29
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent),
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Richard Stallman, 2002/10/29
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Miles Bader, 2002/10/29
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/25
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Miles Bader, 2002/10/25
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/26
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Francesco Potorti`, 2002/10/29
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Peter S Galbraith, 2002/10/29
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/30
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Miles Bader, 2002/10/29