Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX

[Juanma Barranquero]

On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:08:58 -0400, "Stefan Monnier" 
<monnier+gnu/address@hidden> wrote:

> But the count -> index|spix|... switch is just plain silly

Hmm... Not really. There are six or seven different names for the same
concept through the code. Unifying them would be useful, if only to make
understanding simpler for newcomers (like me).

But I suppose others will have to decide what to do in that case :)

                                                           /L/e/k/t/u