[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX |
Date: |
11 Jul 2002 16:48:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:
> On 11 Jul 2002 15:27:33 +0200, address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) wrote:
>
> > For consistency, I suggest to change all occurrences of `specpdl_ptr -
> > specpdl' to SPECPDL_INDEX.
>
> OK, I'll take care of it.
>
> > I'd suggest changing the name of those variables to `specpdl_index' or
> > just `spix' (which isn't currently used anywhere) for short.
>
> "spix" seems a bit cryptic to me.
Less cryptic that specpdl_index? :-)
Actually, `specpdl_index' isn't really good either, as it is not the
current index, but the saved index.
Maybe one of these is better:
old_specpdl
saved_specpdl
specpdl_save
specpdl_base
base_specpdl
specpdl_top
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/09
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/10
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/12
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/12
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/12
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/12