[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question. |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:53:37 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> There is no need for them to be different, so we may as well make them
> the same. Can you figure out the cause of the remaining differences?
Certainly -- it's on my to do list. I'll work on it as I have time.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., (continued)
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Richard Stallman, 2002/06/23
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/24
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/24
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Richard Stallman, 2002/06/24
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/24
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Stefan Monnier, 2002/06/24
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/25
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/25
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/25
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Richard Stallman, 2002/06/26
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.,
Rob Browning <=
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Richard Stallman, 2002/06/25
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Rob Browning, 2002/06/10
Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Richard Stallman, 2002/06/01