Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.

[Eli Zaretskii]

On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Rob Browning wrote:

> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > That's true, but some of the differences are not just order differences.  
> > For example, scroll-bar doesn't appear in one custom-load, and 
> > gnus-article-x-face-command doesn't appear in the non-X version at all.
> 
> Yep, I noticed that.  So is this is a difference that's supposed to
> exist between the X and non-X versions?  If so, then is there a way we
> could (and would want to) fix this to allow the two versions to
> coexist peacefully?

I tend to think that cus-load should not depend on the configuration 
options, unless doing so would cause trouble.