[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 23:18:29 -0600 (MDT) |
> I just created a record in
> my own change log and then copy-pasted it to the emacs changelog.
> All within the same session.
If you did that in the same Emacs session, X selections should have not
been involved: Emacs yanks its own selections directly from the kill
ring, IIRC.
And that by itself should not have affected the rest of the file.
But here's an idea for what might have happened. If the text that
was yanked used some other character set that looks similar
on the screen, that could have affected how the whole file
got saved afterwards.
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, (continued)
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/27
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Michael Kifer, 2002/04/27
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/29
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Gerd Moellmann, 2002/04/29
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/29
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/30
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/30
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/29
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Michael Kifer, 2002/04/29
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/29
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/30
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Michael Kifer, 2002/04/30
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/30
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Michael Kifer, 2002/04/30
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/30
- Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Michael Kifer, 2002/04/30
Re: lisp/ChangeLog coding system, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/04/28