[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: table.el |
Date: |
04 Dec 2001 10:14:30 +0900 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> 3. Establish a convention that the user should write the outside
> function name, quoted, as the second element of WRAPPER-FORM.
>
> It is be useful to be able to test the function name, so I think 3 is
> best.
I suspect that if this is done, people will sometimes want to pass
_another_ name to `with-wrapper-mumble', for instance:
(defun kill-region (beg end)
...do some preprocessing...
(with-wrapper-mumble (kill-region-wrapper-hook 'kill-region-helper beg end)
...do main stuff...))
where `kill-region-helper' is used if there are any wrappers, and ...do
main stuff... is used otherwise (perhaps it will just call
kill-region-helper too).
Should such usage be discouraged? If wrappers actually test the value
of the passed function name, then such usage might be relevant.
-Miles
--
Would you like fries with that?
- Re: table.el, (continued)
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/05
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Robert J. Chassell, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/08
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/08
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/08