[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: table.el |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Dec 2001 01:46:54 -0700 (MST) |
The reason why I needed wrapper mechanism was that I was advised by
you not to use advice in table.el, and that was because
`describe-function' of those advised functions mislead novice users to
table.el where there is no real information about the original
functions. I personally dislike this shortcoming of
`describe-function'.
This could be a bug in advice.el. Could you provide a simple test case?
Perhaps advice.el should do something better to construct the doc string
of the combined function.
- Re: table.el, (continued)
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/05
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Robert J. Chassell, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/08
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/08
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/08
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/08
- Re: table.el, Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/08
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/10
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/11
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/09