[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lexical mumblings
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: lexical mumblings |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:52:12 -0700 (MST) |
However, I'm making the assumption that it's not worth a lot of
extra complexity to make the interpreter ultra efficient (that's
what the byte-compiler is for), and that it's sufficient that it be
`good enough' (after all, macros are expanded every time they're
evaluated!).
I agree. I would much rather have the interpreter changes as simple
as possible, because then it may be feasible to install the changes.
- Re: lexical mumblings, (continued)
- Re: lexical mumblings, Stefan Monnier, 2001/10/26
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/26
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/27
- Re: lexical mumblings, Andrew Innes, 2001/10/29
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/29
- Re: lexical mumblings, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Stefan Monnier, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Andrew Innes, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/31
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Andrew Innes, 2001/10/31
- Re: lexical mumblings, Sam Steingold, 2001/10/26
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/29
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/29
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/29
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/30