[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin
From: |
edgar . soldin |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2} |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Mar 2012 10:42:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 |
On 05.03.2012 07:56, han duply wrote:
> *Hi ede: *
>
> *1.The output of "duply tst2 list -v9" on the Pastebin: *
> http://pastebin.com/iQgvTF0N
the supposedly missing files are listed _in_ the backup
>
> *2.The output of between "ls -la /tmp/restore/sbin" and "ls -la /usr/sbin"
> are different with 105 lines *
>
SNIP
that raises the question why they weren't restored
please restore again tro another folder with -v9 and pastebin that output for
me.
>
>
> *4.My guess: *
> --------------------
> a. Some files are not backuped just because they were running and can't be
> processed by duply.
well they are, see /list/
> b. From the md5sum of the /usr/sbin/accton with /tmp/restore/sbin/accton, I
> guess autually the file accton in /usr/sbin was not backuped.
>
> c. From *the size *of the */usr/sbin * and */tmp/restore/sbin *, I guess some
> files were indeed not backuped.
>
>
> *5.Another info: *
> *-----------------------*
> *** I'm using a VMware under Vista with a CentOS running in the VM
> * VM version:7.15
good to know ..ede
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:37 PM, <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> wrote:
>
> On 04.03.2012 03:12, han duply wrote:
> > *Hi ede: *
> > *So it is---------------------------------------- *
> > *The Pastebin LInk ( PUBLIC- EVERYBODY CAN SEE IT ** ) *:
> > http://pastebin.com/7AkW31TB
> >
> > And the attached file as well included.
>
> ok, the files /missing/ in your diffs are correctly added, see your
> output.
>
> e.g.
> Selecting /usr/sbin/capiinit
> Comparing ('sbin', 'capiinit') and None
> Getting delta of (('sbin', 'capiinit') /usr/sbin/capiinit sym) and None
> A sbin/capiinit
>
> they seem to be all symlinks, maybe they loose there correct target when
> restoring?
>
> could you now please pastebin the output of
> duply <profile> list -v9
> to assure they ended up in the backup?
>
> and try a restore to a temporary location and
> ls -la <tmprestore>
> to see what ends up in the restoration folder.
>
> ede/duply.net <http://duply.net>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
- [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, han duply, 2012/03/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, edgar . soldin, 2012/03/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, han duply, 2012/03/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2},
edgar . soldin <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, han duply, 2012/03/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, edgar . soldin, 2012/03/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, han duply, 2012/03/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, edgar . soldin, 2012/03/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, han duply, 2012/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, edgar . soldin, 2012/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, han duply, 2012/03/09
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duply restore Bug [ # diff -q -r /tmp/restore/sbin /usr/sbin ] Comes wrong! {Amended 2}, edgar . soldin, 2012/03/09