|
From: | Kenneth Loafman |
Subject: | Re: [Duplicity-talk] tgz snapshots |
Date: | Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:29:56 -0600 |
On 28.02.2012 15:28, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:19 AM, SanskritFritz <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:34 PM, <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
> > On 27.02.2012 21 <tel:27.02.2012%2021>:00, SanskritFritz wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:02 PM, <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:> [1] http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/commit/?h=packages/duplicity&id=d0397e2092a730aa5fefd7b630c1beac939cc884 <http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/commit/?h=packages/duplicity&id=d0397e2092a730aa5fefd7b630c1beac939cc884>
> >>> i am thinking about setting up a duplicity snapshot repository building snapshot tgz distros by revision.
> >>>
> >>> any interest on the list for that?
> >>
> >> If I don't even understand what you mean, I'm probably not interested? :p
> >>
> >
> > as releases are sparsely but sometimes fixes already made their way into trunk i thought offering snapshot distros of the development branch would make sense.
> >
> > opinions?
>
> So you mean, no patches like this [1] would be necessary? I support
> the idea. But then again, why not just release new versions more
> often?
>
>
>
> Yes, no patches would be necessary with the tarball releases. We also have the daily builds at the team PPA <https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team/+archive/daily> if you're on Ubuntu.
>hmm, is this
> ede, you might want to check with Mike Terry to see if you can build these along side the PPA.
>
> I will be trying to get 0.6.18 out this week as a standard release.
>
https://launchpad.net/~duplicity-team/+archive/ppa
alive and active? latest build seems to miss change on 15.2.2012 ...
i actually intended the easy way. bzr checkout, autoupdate via cron and run the dist making script. upload to sf.net/files .
@mike: is there an easier way through launchpad?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |