[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch
From: |
Dan Muresan |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch |
Date: |
Sun, 02 Nov 2008 23:29:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) |
> I don't have any stats, but my understanding is that glib is not a
> bloated library. Nor does duplicity seem like an application that
OK, I suppose I wasn't very clear; my concern was the number of
dependencies / ease of installation -- not performance. In an embedded /
server environment, one wants to minimize the set of installed packages.
Pulling an extra library often brings a whole new set of problems
(availability, version compatibility, cross-compilation etc). Each
dependency also increases the required disk space on the target (another
form of bloat).
Requiring a running dbus daemon would be even worse (wasted RAM), but I
understand that this won't be the case.
If one could optionally avoid the glib dependency (like the dbus one),
it wouldn't really matter; but I assume that with a glib main loop that
won't be possible.
> P.S. It's worth pointing out that dbus supposedly can use qlib's main
> loop instead of glib, but that seems like a toss-up, bloat wise, and
> less widely used by the dbus universe.
You are right, of the two glib would probably be preferable.
-- Dan
- [Duplicity-talk] dbus patch, Michael Terry, 2008/11/02
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Michael Terry, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Dan Muresan, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Michael Terry, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch,
Dan Muresan <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Michael Terry, 2008/11/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Dan Muresan, 2008/11/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Michael Terry, 2008/11/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Dan Muresan, 2008/11/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Edgar Soldin, 2008/11/04
- [Duplicity-talk] asynchronous-uploads, Richard Scott, 2008/11/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] asynchronous-uploads, Peter Schuller, 2008/11/07
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Michael Terry, 2008/11/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Dan Muresan, 2008/11/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Michael Terry, 2008/11/06