[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU
From: |
Gopal.V |
Subject: |
Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)) |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Mar 2002 23:20:36 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, Bill Lance wrote:
>
> I mean in context of switching to the GPL. Did
> Lindows attempt to take wine propietary?
>
YES, it tried to use winelib for Lindows (which is
closed) . Since Wine was X licensed , they could do that
and get away with it.
But since now Wine is GPL'd, patches from Wine cannot
be applied on to Lindows -- making sure Lindows doesn't
sell off Wine developers altruistic efforts.
Gopal.V
--
The difference between insanity and genius is only measured by success
//===<=>===\\
|| GNU RULEZ ||
\\===<=>===//
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), (continued)
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/24
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 2002/03/24
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), David Sugar, 2002/03/24
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/25
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 2002/03/25
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/24
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 2002/03/24
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Sasa J., 2002/03/25
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 2002/03/24
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Bill Lance, 2002/03/24
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)),
Gopal.V <=
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), John, 2002/03/24
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (wasRe:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Seth Johnson, 2002/03/24
- AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Carsten Kuckuk, 2002/03/25
- Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Tim TerlegÄrd, 2002/03/25
- AW: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Carsten Kuckuk, 2002/03/25
- Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 2002/03/25
- Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/25
- Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 2002/03/25
- payback time for MS & BSD...or, this subject line is getting too long (was Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables))), S11001001, 2002/03/25
- [DotGNU]Re: payback time for MS & BSD, Daniel Carrera, 2002/03/25