[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and G
From: |
James Michael DuPont |
Subject: |
Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC) |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Mar 2002 09:40:14 -0800 (PST) |
> > Is it possible to extract enough infomation from
> the
> > CIL files to produce c-code? a de-parse?
> Since C is just a high level assembly language,
> If a JIT is possible this "must" be possible.
Good, Then we can glue the CIL decoder as a gcc
frontend?
> But the question is will this be useful ?.
To be able to create a native exe via tha gcc given a
CIL file? yes!
> We are losing our most
> important
> point -- binary compatiblity.
After that we can try and get the CIL back out,
after the optimisation takes place.
One step at a time.
> Also I hope you'll be there @ IRC and thrash out
> all these
> stuff (including dreams & wishful thinking) about
> how to make
> Pnet the fastest,leanest and meanest runtime in the
> block.
I'd love to, but i am flying back home to NJ to visit
my parents on saturday, so I dont think i'll be
getting too much online time,
But I will try to drop in!
Otherwise we can setup a chat in on the pnet
specifically on another time.
mike
=====
James Michael DuPont
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
http://sports.yahoo.com/
- Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), (continued)
- Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 2002/03/12
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/12
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/12
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/12
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/13
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/13
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 2002/03/13
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/13
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/14
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 2002/03/14
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC),
James Michael DuPont <=
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/14
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/14
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/14
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/15
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 2002/03/15
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/15
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/20
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 2002/03/20
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/20
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/21