[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and G
From: |
Gopal.V |
Subject: |
Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC) |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Mar 2002 19:42:06 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, James Michael DuPont wrote:
> Is it possible to extract enough infomation from the
> CIL files to produce c-code? a de-parse?
Since C is just a high level assembly language, If a JIT
is possible this "must" be possible. But the question is
will this be useful ?. We are losing our most important
point -- binary compatiblity.
> Why not make the CIL reader just interface to the gcc
> as if it was reading a c file that was dumped?
Dumped ?. Since Rhys is the person who "knows all" (not me),
he might be able to answer this question correctly. Not for me
to hazard a guess.
Also I hope you'll be there @ IRC and thrash out all these
stuff (including dreams & wishful thinking) about how to make
Pnet the fastest,leanest and meanest runtime in the block.
Gopal.V
--
The difference between insanity and genius is only measured by success
//===<=>===\\
|| GNU RULEZ ||
\\===<=>===//
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/12
- Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 2002/03/12
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/12
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/12
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/12
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/13
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/13
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 2002/03/13
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/13
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/14
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC),
Gopal.V <=
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/14
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/14
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/14
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/14
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/15
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 2002/03/15
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/15
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/20
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 2002/03/20
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/20