[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open
From: |
Norbert Bollow |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Mar 2002 10:29:05 +0100 |
Seth,
I totally agree that issues related to content control are of
key strategic importance, and that Microsoft is fully aware
of this, perhaps more than others. However I don't see how
this would have anything to do with the license change of those
C# class libs.
Greetings, Norbert.
> Yes, sorry, but I was browsing old messages last night. I
> think the problem of content control gets tiptoed around a
> bit. But I think that .Net is hanging its hat on the
> prospect of establishing content control, so Microsoft can
> sell its DRM OS, more than most anything else.
>
> Seth Johnson
>
>
> Norbert Bollow wrote:
> >
> > > What statement are you folks refering to? I can't
> > > fins the previous messages.
> >
> > The statement was something like Intel and HP being able to
> > contribute to the Mono C# class libs only after the license of
> > those libs was changed to a non-copyleft license.
--
A founder of the http://DotGNU.org project and Steering Committee member
Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet (near Zurich, Switzerland)
Tel +41 1 972 20 59 Fax +41 1 972 20 69 http://thinkcoach.com
List hosting with GNU Mailman on your own domain name http://cisto.com