[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open
From: |
Seth Johnson |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Mar 2002 03:58:18 -0500 |
I think the likelihood is much more to do with content
control schemes, that Mono probably doesn't have wind of
yet.
Seth Johnson
Norbert Bollow wrote:
>
> The only explanation for this statement which I can see is
> that the corporations in question are afraid of the possibility
> of some kind of retaliation from Microsoft against companies
> which contribute to the Mono libraries under GPL. If the
> library is not copylefted anymore, then maybe Microsoft does
> not see it as a threat anymore, and the managements of those
> corporations would not be concerned about the possibility of
> retaliation from Microsoft. This would clearly make the
> decision to contribute easier.
- Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open,
Seth Johnson <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Bill Lance, 2002/03/08
- Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/08
- Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Seth Johnson, 2002/03/08
- Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Seth Johnson, 2002/03/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Seth Johnson, 2002/03/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Open Source's Dot-Net Less Open, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/11